Philippines Eyes High-Value Lapu-Lapu Farming to Boost Aquaculture Sector

In the evolving landscape of Philippine aquaculture, there is growing interest in cultivating Lapu-Lapu (grouper), a high-value fish that commands prices ranging from ₱800 to ₱1,395 per kilogram. This significantly outpaces the market rates for tilapia (₱43 to ₱271/kg) and milkfish (₱150 to ₱250/kg), positioning Lapu-Lapu as a potentially lucrative alternative for local fish farmers.

Lapu-Lapu's appeal extends beyond local demand, enjoying popularity in international markets such as Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and Singapore. Transitioning to its farming could strengthen local aquaculture and enhance export revenues.

Despite considerable startup costs for Lapu-Lapu cultivation, industry experts suggest that forming cooperatives can alleviate financial pressures. Pooling resources allows fish farmers to collectively purchase equipment, feed, and other inputs, lowering overall expenses. Moreover, the premium prices associated with Lapu-Lapu make it feasible to recover investments swiftly, yielding long-term profitability.

Experts advocate for a diversified aquaculture approach, recommending that farmers continue growing tilapia and milkfish alongside Lapu-Lapu, but in separate ponds due to differing dietary needs. An environmental advantage is noted: Lapu-Lapu consume "trash fish," including unsellable tilapia and milkfish, reducing waste and improving farm efficiency.

Sustainability is also a priority, with emphasis on integrating fishponds with existing mangrove ecosystems rather than clearing them. Mangroves provide critical habitats and natural nurseries for marine life, supporting biodiversity and coastal resilience. Current best practices encourage mangrove restoration and replanting as essential components of sustainable aquaculture developments.

Realizing this vision requires enhanced coordination among key government bodies including the Department of Agriculture (DA), Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), Department of Science and Technology (DOST), and the Philippine Council for Agriculture, Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development (PCAARRD). Their roles include delivering training, technical support, and funding assistance. The Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) can further facilitate cooperative models, while the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) is encouraged to promote research and knowledge transfer through academic institutions.

Some have debated the appropriateness of naming the grouper after the national hero Lapu-Lapu. Advocates argue that associating a prized fish with the legendary figure honors his legacy, as also seen in the naming of a major Cebu city after him.

Ultimately, embracing high-value grouper farming offers the Philippines a transformative path to elevate its aquaculture sector. Through cooperative farming, sustainable environmental practices, and unified governmental support, this initiative could expand export capacity, boost employment, and strengthen food security within the country.

The pivotal question for stakeholders remains: Is the Philippines ready to invest in the promising potential of Lapu-Lapu aquaculture?